Bad Beef Again?
01-15-2005, 07:12 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by DWVW:
All of the cases save one are from before 1997 when new testing went into place. That is 8 years ago. The one case supposedly is from after 1997, but we can let the inspectors figure it out before we jump to conclusions, it is possible that it was old feed that should have been destroyed.
Personally I have nothing against the U.S. beinig cautious. I would be too. But they should lift all their softwood tariffs etc. or we should stop sending them watter electricity and oil and see who is really in a position of bargaining power. Of course our spineless Liberals would never do that.
All of the cases save one are from before 1997 when new testing went into place. That is 8 years ago. The one case supposedly is from after 1997, but we can let the inspectors figure it out before we jump to conclusions, it is possible that it was old feed that should have been destroyed.
Personally I have nothing against the U.S. beinig cautious. I would be too. But they should lift all their softwood tariffs etc. or we should stop sending them watter electricity and oil and see who is really in a position of bargaining power. Of course our spineless Liberals would never do that.
01-15-2005, 07:14 PM
#14
Yankee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,599
Actually they put cellulose in our food... usually as filler or caking agent of some sort
http://www.psrc.usm.edu/macrog/cell.htm
I usually find cellulose as an ingredient in cheap pre-ground Parmesan cheese too often
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMm Canadian lumber
[ January 15, 2005, 09:11 PM: Message edited by: JohnVroom ]
http://www.psrc.usm.edu/macrog/cell.htm
I usually find cellulose as an ingredient in cheap pre-ground Parmesan cheese too often
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMm Canadian lumber
[ January 15, 2005, 09:11 PM: Message edited by: JohnVroom ]
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
