veeman

iTrader: (3)

hahahahahahahaha...big surprise! Can I take back my "yes" vote, this is getting more entertaining by the day...i actually want Dogman to stay now.

DeadlySones

iTrader: (4)

lmfao...this is why I've been saving my vote till the end...

dogbaker

LOL - What, like I'm the only one!

I sent you guy's (the moderators) a PM asking you to slow down the poor, roaming comments of those that have created new identities, only to come directly to my thread and cause trouble. My request went unanswered and more kept coming in the same way, like DIEM, so I thought, fine I can play that game as well, and I had my wife get in on the action, but for some reason, you have only called me on it and not others.

Let's be clear, I wasn't looking to hiding it (if I was you won't have known), I was calling you into action, Newguy's posts were truthful, and she merely highlighted those facts as they were originally presented.

I have posted a large amount of factual data, that CCA members are interested in learning about, but for some reason (no objective reasons) you have allowed this circus to continue.

Other members (other than Newguy) have chimed in as well; in support of settling things down and you have done nothing. I release a poll and it clearly shows (12-Yes & 17 No) that more are interested then not in what I have posted etc, but still you have let this go on! You certainly haven't represented the voice of the majority!

While I have made several strong attempts to change my tone and that of others, and have also accepted responsibility for my part in the initial derailment of this thread, you and others in governing positions within CCA, have done the polar opposite.

I wonder who DIEM is, a moderator perhaps?

So does revealing CCA as a biased, bullying forum get me banded?

If so - so be it, at least someone finally took a solid stand in here against the suppression of object facts and bullying!

And besides, I needed some evidence for another matter and you have provided it!

In doing so you have concluded my initial need for being here.

I am sure that you will consider sensoring this post!

PS I do have a good idea - that same one I been presenting everyday - let's all get past this and get back to sharing... not smack talk but ideas and experiances and if we don't agree we simply move to another post.

Okay?

But without the moderators helping us all to push the "Reset Button" it's not going to happen.

Look, you only have four interwoven choices here, making this a defining moment for CCA

1) You ban me (the easy choice to manage)
2) You intervene and settle us all down (the hard but right choice to manage)
3) You do nothing (which is what you have been doing all along - the passive choice)
4) I leave (the only choice for me if you don't help me turn this thread around)

I am prepared to accept any outcome, but this insn't just about me.

I have been fighting for what's right, I have become a pain in the *** because everything is wrong!

dogbaker

It's comments like these and others that make my point!

DeadlySones

iTrader: (4)

Whatever that point might be??? I personally don't care.

Whatever man... you don't know me, any better than I know you... I have found some of your info interesting, other stuff amusing... my above comment was just that I don't judge people by their shell... as already mentioned, I could have jumped ahead of myself and voted early... I just planned to wait and see if/how ones attitude might change... nothing more. You just made **** easy for me.

Enjoy your stay... At least I don't have to hide behind multiple personalities.

dogbaker

And I was doing mostly that same things as you, waiting, seeing and in my case hoping attitudes and behaviors would have changed.

But the problem here isn't between you and me, nor with the knowledge that I have shared, or even how I've shared it - it's that the moderator let this become a circus, because they didn't want to rock the boat with some members... I chilled out and made a clear effort to get everyone else to chill as well, and I failed, so I was forced to go to extremes. Most people would just move on but that doesn't do anyone any good in the long run. I read the rules on my way in - I don't know why they're not ruling properly!

Diem

Bzzzzzzt.

I see grammar and syntax are not your forte.

You're mistaken.

One can 'promote' themselves with/without being 'self-aggrandizing'.

Being a megalomaniac is not a prerequisite to salesmanship.

Thanks for playing, though...
I said it would be fine if you ignored me.

I never said I would stop posting....
He's free to do so.
Google " comb filtering" and 'standing waves', 'in room response', near field vs far field frequency response', 'room gain' 'baffle step compensation' 'diffraction' 'lobing' 'phase rotation' 'stereo imaging' and you'll find all the explanations, graphs, and white papers you want, that will put a fine point on why you've got a steep uphill battle when trying to create an audio system within the constraints of a car cabin that's linear and has a flat frequency response, and is in phase.
Just for the record....what you said was not very articulate, or precise.
Since you don't know who I am, that's an incredibly ignorant presumption to make....
Google is your friend...

Sorry to burst your bubble, but I'm not a sock puppet profile.

I'm a newbie.

I'm not in the car audio game. I'm in the audiophile game, and was invited by the sons of a good friend of mine, who have gotten into car audio.

They're always asking about things they've read on car audio forums, only to find out that there are many laws of physics that are completely ignored, or overlooked, in car audio.

Stop being butt hurt.

Stop being paranoid that I'm anyone but a newbie, who ALSO has knowledge, and was invited to take a look at this forum, and decided to jump in.

You have no one to blame but yourself, for the impression you've made on people.
You didn't have to come in here posturing in the manner in which you did.

But you did. You wanted to differentiate yourself, and put yourself above the masses, and develop a following of disciples. And condescend to those who HAVE gained the respect of other members here.

One upmanship.

You did not want to 'join' a community.
You wanted to be looked at, as 'special'.

Which is why you played the enigma.

Forums such as these are more about 'show and tell' and open dialogue than they are about grandstanding, and pointing to accomplishments that there is no evidence of.

And you wonder why people may not be so warm to you?...

Face it. You ****ed up.

SID0001

iTrader: (1)

Newguy seems to have multiple personalities using dogbaker and Newguy sharing the same computer.



Ha! I knew one was under the desk while the other was typing!

dogbaker

Yah she was under the desk on more than one occasion

d4rin

I watch this thread every day because it is so entertaining.

Also, Dogbaker should stay.