General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

W7 vs concept CSP-15...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2003, 03:14 PM
  #31  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Chadxton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,707
Post

I often wonder why others have a problem quoting people.
I would only extend that amount of money for a JL sub knowing that it is the best of the best, and that the only way to get the best is to buy this sub for X number of thousands of dollars. Then again, there's so much controversy it discourages me from making my own educated guess, and I get confused as to whether it's BS reasoning or good reasoning. Therefore, no money is spent and the music/car audio industry suffers.
To some it appears that if what they hear and see pleases them the most, money won't likely get in the way of acquiring that peice of equipment. The W7 sells after all, doesn't it?
Chadxton is offline  
Old 09-15-2003, 03:08 PM
  #33  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
dB Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,113
Post

I have owned both subwoofers in various sizes and I would have to agree with alot of you who don't like the price of a JL but its price is slowly coming down.

The build quality on the JL is second to none, with the CSP's having many points for improvement.

Both subs are good for making low frequencies very loud but I would still lean towards the JL getting louder given the MUCH higher mechanical limits. I would even think its louder with anything over 500wrms

If it were me planning to buy a subwoofer to last me 5+years I would go for the JL.

I have some JLW7 excursion videos that are pretty cool if anyone wants to see it moving 3+inches


LOL "CES Subwoofer parts buffet" [img]smile.gif[/img]
dB Don is offline  
Old 09-15-2003, 03:08 PM
  #34  
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
t raver1 smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 342
Red face

Originally posted by cujo:
Concept dosen't design their parts. They pick the voice coil ***. , the magnet, terminals, the cone etc and then order them all up and have someone slap it together. They are making an educated guess as to how those woofers will perform.
JL designed AND did the original tooling of the W7 parts individualy each for a particular purpose and target end goal. That is design.
once again, against my better judgement i am posting a response to what can only be an infantile, obssesive compulisive desire to not quit while your ahead. A) Concept does design their own woofers. if you don't believe me contact them at www.concept-concept.com. B) everthing is an educated guess ( they call these guessers engineers, and their education is university or college degrees) and until it is actually prototyped, no one can say how it is going to perform.

once again, i repeat. my preference for Concept has nothing to do with anything except my experiences with both products (13-14 yrs with JL, and 2 yrs with Concept). i like Concept and am smart enough to have respect for what JL has done over the years, and to give them their due. you should be smart enough not to talk s**t about something you have no clue about. [img]graemlins/boring.gif[/img]
t raver1 smith is offline  
Old 09-15-2003, 03:13 PM
  #35  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
dB Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,113
Post

Originally posted by Gilligans Hitch:
It's entertaining to see people compare two very good products and try to see which one is BEST.
So true so true

You want the real truth?
Both speakers are nothing until you do something with it, the overal result is derived from ones ability to understand the product or follow directions.
dB Don is offline  
Old 09-15-2003, 04:58 PM
  #36  
0 Watt CAFz'r
 
PointSource1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1
Post

Originally posted by dB Don:
I have owned both subwoofers in various sizes
Great post from someone who has the experience with both drivers and isn't using preconceived notions to draw conclusions...
PointSource1 is offline  
Old 09-15-2003, 09:41 PM
  #37  
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
Haunz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,218
Post

To some extent I am going to have to agree with cujo on alot of stuff....

You can find alot of brands from RE to treo to shocker to SRT to BA ect. that share many of the same spiders/cones/baskets/surrounds/magnets/backplates/VC's ... maybe they wind thier own coils or have some other parts that are unique...

But, it seems to me like these companies probably just assemble the parts in different configurations and find something they like....

If the T/S specs look good for a sub (which they always will, the rest is designing the right box) and the glue holds together properly.... they are good to go...

JL designed absolutly everything on the W7 from the ground up... and while a few subs like the new XXX and adire's tumult have an edge over some others with XBL^2, JL still has them beat for performance....


hehehe... on a side note I can look at my asian source catologs and find parts for many 'namebrand' woofers..... [img]redface.gif[/img]

[ September 15, 2003, 10:53 PM: Message edited by: Haunz ]
Haunz is offline  
Old 09-15-2003, 09:54 PM
  #38  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Bulldogger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,474
Post

Originally posted by dB Don:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Gilligans Hitch:
It's entertaining to see people compare two very good products and try to see which one is BEST.
So true so true

You want the real truth?
Both speakers are nothing until you do something with it, the overal result is derived from ones ability to understand the product or follow directions.
</font>[/QUOTE]werd
Bulldogger is offline  
Old 09-15-2003, 10:02 PM
  #39  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Bulldogger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,474
Post

Originally posted by Haunz:

JL designed absolutly everything on the W7 from the ground up... and while a few subs like the new XXX and adire's tumult have an edge over some others with XBL^2, JL still has them beat for performance....
I don't know about that yet, maybe dbDon could enlighten us(I'm sure he's tested both XXX's & w7's).

price/performance
Bulldogger is offline  
Old 09-15-2003, 11:35 PM
  #40  
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
cujo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 548
Post

Originally posted by Haunz:
To some extent I am going to have to agree with cujo on alot of stuff....

You can find alot of brands from RE to treo to shocker to SRT to BA ect. that share many of the same spiders/cones/baskets/surrounds/magnets/backplates/VC's ... maybe they wind thier own coils or have some other parts that are unique...

But, it seems to me like these companies probably just assemble the parts in different configurations and find something they like....

If the T/S specs look good for a sub (which they always will, the rest is designing the right box) and the glue holds together properly.... they are good to go...

JL designed absolutly everything on the W7 from the ground up... and while a few subs like the new XXX and adire's tumult have an edge over some others with XBL^2, JL still has them beat for performance....


hehehe... on a side note I can look at my asian source catologs and find parts for many 'namebrand' woofers..... [img]redface.gif[/img]
[img]graemlins/thumb.gif[/img] Lovely to hear from someone else who recognizes recycling when they see it.
cujo is offline  


Quick Reply: W7 vs concept CSP-15...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:32 AM.