LMT

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

09-14-2005 | 09:56 AM

#11

Cavalier Chunk

2000 Watt CAFz'r

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 2,423

yeah i know. how do you think i keep my head on. it's screwed on to my neck.

09-15-2005 | 11:45 PM

#12

Speakerman

Thread Starter

Yankee

Joined: Aug 2004

Posts: 219

Its different, of course, but I wouldn't say its anything to complain about.

09-16-2005 | 04:16 AM

#13

Hardwrkr

2000 Watt CAFz'r

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Mar 2003

Posts: 3,542

Quote:

Originally posted by aneonrider:

There may be some people complaining how they do not like the sound, which will be a result of the completely flat BL, and extremely low distortion, both of which, people are not used to.

Unless of course they have auditioned a Brahma, XXX,.......

09-16-2005 | 10:55 AM

#14

Speakerman

Thread Starter

Yankee

Joined: Aug 2004

Posts: 219

Quote:

Originally posted by Hardwrkr:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by aneonrider:

There may be some people complaining how they do not like the sound, which will be a result of the completely flat BL, and extremely low distortion, both of which, people are not used to.

Unless of course they have auditioned a Brahma, XXX,....... </font>[/QUOTE]Well actually the brama and XXX use the XBL^2 technology...the graph of the BL force is actually a parabolic function of x, or something close to y = -X^2. The motor force drops with a parabolic curve as the diaphram moves away from resting position.

The LMT is completely different. The graph of BL force is almost exactly linear where the motor force stays the same as the diaphram moves away from resting position.

Two completely different driver designs.